Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crespo, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 22, No. 4, 347-367 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1043986206297094

Institutional Legitimacy and Crime in Venezuela

Freddy Crespo

Universidad de Los Andes, Venezuela

Crime rates in Venezuela increased considerably at the end of the 1970s, and even more so from the mid-1990s onward. Likewise, the country’s major institutions experienced considerable change, moving from constant growth through crisis to a gradual loss of legitimacy. Based on LaFree’s model of institutional legitimacy and crime, the author tests the hypothesis that the declining legitimacy of key institutions was associated with increasing crime rates. Government statistics are used to measure institutional legitimacy and crime rates for the period between 1957 and 2003. Statistical analysis based on auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) techniques and cross-correlation finds no relationship between the two sets of variables, with the partial exception of robbery. These findings should be considered provisional rather than definitive because alternative variables, additional observations, and alternative statistical techniques might have produced different results. However, alternative explanations of crime rates should also be explored.

Key Words: crime • legitimacy • crime rates • Venezuela


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?